Design Review
Artifact info
Title:

Website Content & Hero Direction

Engagement:

Uncommon Partners

Client:

Uncommon Partners

Meeting Date:
April 30, 2026
Next Meeting Date:
May 7, 2026
Hide This
April 21, 2026
Hide This
January 20, 2026
Hide This
January 7, 2026
Hide This
People
James Redenbaugh
Peter Wrinch
Artifact Image
Meeting Summary

📝 Content Status & Process Reflection

Peter shared that all website content is now complete except for the hero statement (03:20). The current placeholder reads something like "let's walk together" paired with "uncommon partnership for something something" — and while the uncommon partnership language is landing strongly, the opening line still isn't quite right. He's been sitting with it all week and trusts it will come.

The writing process itself proved valuable beyond the deliverable. Peter used Claude [tag="claude"] extensively, uploading his five most recent proposals to synthesize how he's currently representing himself in high-stakes conversations (05:43). The work has already paid dividends — he referenced a recent pitch meeting where the clarity of his model helped him articulate his offering to potential clients and their funders.

On repetition across pages, Claude offered a useful reframe: visitors enter at different pages, so some thematic repetition reinforces rather than detracts. Peter accepted this and moved on.

🎯 Purpose of the Site & the Hero Question

The team revisited the website's core purpose: social proofing, not lead generation (08:59). Peter's business comes through word of mouth, and the website's role is to validate him before and between the conversations that actually convert. He described a recent three-call sequence with a prospective client where the website, once live, would have been surfaced to donors before his call with them.

This reframes the hero's job. It isn't to sell — it's to create a moment of recognition where the right reader thinks, "I see myself in this. I see my need in this."

The Verb Problem

Peter's stuck on the verb. "Let's walk together" feels too soft. What he actually wants to transmit is "I'm with you" — the assurance that he won't abandon the client mid-journey. But as James noted, saying "I'm with you" directly in the hero implies you're with everyone, which dilutes the intimacy a prospective client should feel arriving at the site (17:14).

Claude generated four directional options to explore:

  • A better world becomes possible
  • Some work doesn't have a map
  • The work that matters most
  • With you, together

The third and fourth resonated most. The subhead "uncommon partnership for leaders doing big things" is close, though "big things" still feels generic. Peter committed to delivering a hero direction by end of next day.

🖥️ Prototype Review

James shared a Claude-generated prototype mockup for initial reaction (31:07). Strengths included spacious white space, clean fonts (generated without specific direction), the circle motif coming in nicely, and a beautiful green footer. The "Trusted by" logo placement felt right.

The critique: it reads as AI-generated and stark. It needs life and attitude. Peter named what was missing — aliveness — while affirming that the qualities he wants the site to embody are unhurried, present, and spacious (38:01). The site sits between a sales funnel and an artistic home for a thinker; neither extreme is right.

🌿 Digital Pattern Language

James introduced the framework he's been developing with Claude, drawing from Christopher Alexander's pattern language and "quality without a name" — alive, whole, eternal, free, exact, egoless, comfortable (34:10). He's synthesizing Alexander with McLuhan, Buckminster Fuller, Frank Lloyd Wright, Keith Critchlow, and contemporary UI thinkers into a digital pattern language with qualities like alive, present, dignified, spacious, honest, gift, and unhurried.

A particularly useful piece: Alexander's anti-patterns, which translate clearly to digital design — infinite scroll, fake urgency, confirm shaming, attention abstraction. Peter recognized the parallel in his own writing process: Claude initially produced "we're not just X, we're Y" framings that he stripped out, refusing to use guilt or comparison as coercion. He doesn't need to argue why his work is better — readers will recognize fit or they won't.

[technology="Parametric Geometric Interfaces"]

📸 Imagery Strategy

Photos of Peter & Pamela

Peter has corporate-style headshots but feels they fall flat in his proposals (21:21). Two ideas surfaced:

  1. collage approach — mixing professional shots with weirder, more textured images, possibly including artifacts that are part of his daily process
  2. Candid action shots of Peter and Pamela together during their May 11–14 time near Los Angeles

James strongly endorsed the collage direction, noting that we are not our bodies and faces anyway. Including meaningful objects, art, or artifacts alongside portraits creates pathways into Peter for the partners getting to know him (25:01).

James also mentioned a potential project manager hire who holds a PhD in collaborative photography from Northern Ireland — a facilitative process where the subject participates in the image-making. Possibly relevant for future work.

Stock Imagery

Peter's stance: stock photos of nature and abstract scenes are fine; stock photos of "perfectly diverse boardrooms" are not (28:09). James offered access to his iStock subscription with credits expiring this month, encouraging Peter to start a board of images and especially video clips that resonate, without worrying yet about placement.

💭 Special Moments on the Site

James invited Peter to think about interactions, components, or particular spaces that could offer a prospective client a pathway in — a moment of reflection, an experience of receiving value before any commitment, or an opportunity to share something themselves (42:37). Anything is possible at the prototype stage.

For the hero specifically, James floated the idea of a horizon-oriented image where the underline beneath "uncommon partnership" matches the horizon line, grounding the spaciousness without making it feel empty.

🗓️ Path Forward

Weekly check-ins to maintain rhythm toward a May launch. Once the prototype direction feels right, the build moves into Webflow [tag="webflow"], gets pushed to a domain, and goes live.

Action Items

Peter Wrinch

  • Finalize hero statement copy by end of next day (20:37)
  • Capture photos of personally meaningful artifacts and drop into a shared Google Drive (25:23)
  • Coordinate candid/collage photo session with Pamela during May 11–14 (21:21)
  • Review iStock and start a board of resonant images and video clips (29:47)
  • Sit with the shared prototype and reflect on special moments or interactions the site could offer (41:37)
  • Send the calendar invite for next week's meeting (45:10)

James Redenbaugh

  • Share the current Claude-generated prototype with Peter (41:25)
  • Build a deeper second iteration incorporating today's discussion and digital pattern language research (41:39)
  • Share the digital pattern language framework and scale ladder context with Peter (42:54)
  • Move to Webflow build [tag="webflow"] once prototype direction is confirmed (44:00)
Relevant Initiatives

Phase 2: Structure & Content

Priority: 
High
Size: 
L
Planning Stage

Phase 3: Site Design

Priority: 
High
Size: 
L
Coordinating

Phase 4: Development

Priority: 
High
Size: 
M
Planning Stage
Transcript